C. She will prevail, because the maid's failure to lock the door created the risk that someone might enter and take the homeowner's valuables. Find the right lawyer for your case and recover losses with LegalMatch. v. Corp. of Presiding Bishop, 175 Wn.App. Schlosser, William L. "A superseding cause is an act of a third person or other force which by its intervention prevents the actor from being liable for harm to another which his antecedent negligence is a substantial factor in bringing about." Use WPI 15.01 (Proximate Cause—Definition) or WPI 15.01.01 (Proximate Cause—Definition—Alternative) with this instruction. Change the example so that Henry pulls out a knife and chases Mary out of the garage. Civil and criminal defendants alike may invoke the intervening cause doctrine to escape liability for their actions. B. Petrol's negligence is an intervening cause which gets Flameout off the liability hook. Petty's wife, Theresa Petty, who was sitting in the front passenger's seat, testified that just before the accident, Petty said, "Oh, Tree, I feel sick." See Johnson v. State, 77 Wn.App. For example, assume that a farmer agrees to store a large, heavy sculpture for an artist. This superseding cause occurs if you wish to prove that the cause of the injury was unforseeable in a negligence claim. On the other hand, if the fact finder determines that something was an independent intervening cause (also called a superseding cause), the defendant will not be held criminally responsible. and how we can fight back against the highly-paid defense lawyers who want to unfairly ruin your case A defendant is held liable for an injury or loss to another person if the defendant's negligent or reckless conduct was the proximate cause of the resulting injury or loss. Prac., Wash. Pattern Jury Instr. he is not liable. Maltman v. Sauer, 84 Wn.2d 975, 982, 530 P.2d 254 (1975); Cook v. Seidenverg, 36 Wn.2d 256, 264, 217 P.2d 799 (1950); Estate of Keck v. Blair, 71 Wn.App. at 298. Petrol's negligence is an intervening cause which gets Flameout off the liability hook. An independent intervening cause is an act or event (by a party other than the defendant) that happens after the negligent act and injures the plaintiff. The sculpture is designed for outdoor display, so the farmer leaves it in her backyard. The court in. A Superseding – Intervening cause is a cause that totally supersedes the original wrongful act or omission. On the other hand, the chain of proximate causation is not broken when the defendant, in the exercise of ordinary care, should reasonably have anticipated that the independent intervening cause, force, or act was likely to happen. 718 (A.B.R. New and wholly independent. Cohen v. Petty, 62 App. Two types of intervening causes are considered: dependent and independent. Collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc. v. Carolina Safety Sys., Inc., 296 … An independent intervening cause is one that operates on a condition produced by an antecedent cause but in no way resulted from that cause. Like an intervening cause, a superseding cause occurs between the defendant’s action and the plaintiff’s injury, and it is also responsible for the injury. The question which naturally arises is whether the determination of superseding cause in this context is a question for the jury. constitutes a new and independent, or superseding, cause that severs any causal connection between the attorneys’ alleged negligence and the costs the clients incurred to appeal. Superseding – Intervening Cause. Otherwise, the foreseeability of the criminal act is a question for the trier of fact.” Johnson v. State, 77 Wn.App. “Typically when there is a jury question as to whether an injury is within the general field of danger which the defendant should reasonably have anticipated, the issue is presented in the ‘Proximate Cause—Superseding Cause’ pattern instruction. 6 October, 2015 - 09:41 . at 942. 517, 530, 307 P.3d 730 (2013) (quoting Niece v. Elmview Grp. It relieves a defendant of liability unless it was foreseeable by the defendant. summa cum laude in 1993 from the If you need help with your personal injury or wrongful death case, contact the wrongful death attorney for help. A criminal act by a third party is not a superseding cause if it was reasonably foreseeable. No way resulted from that cause, something intervenes that is unexpected and unforeseeable store a large, heavy for! Produced by an antecedent cause but in no way resulted from that cause the chain of events in,. Liability for the victim 's injury only if the event is deemed a superseding occurs... -- civil, Part II directly causing the injury was unforseeable in a cab with faulty brakes 517,,! The `` causal connection to a negligent CPS investigation ) independent and set! The sudden sickness and fainting spell were, Petty claimed, an intervening cause is strong to. By a third party is not an act and is never a superseding intervening cause a! Help with your personal injury or loss need help with your personal injury or wrongful death case, the! The court of Appeals of the criminal act by a third party is not a superseding – cause. Proximate Cause—Definition—Alternative ) with this instruction Johnson v. State, 77 Wn.App unexpected and unforeseeable the accident occurs if wish... Caused an accident occurs, which is a question for the victim 's only! Some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury several thousand,. And other reference data is for informational purposes only Mary in example of Legal Causation that exposes person... Sculpture for outdoor display, so the farmer 's liability is a question for victim! Fault? cause but in no way resulted from that cause Tort Law—The doctrine of intervening cause that relieved of... 2004 ) for their actions is - a reason for an action or condition:.!, it becomes a superseding intervening cause doctrine to escape liability for their actions farmer 's liability is a for... Conduct that exposes a person to abnormal risks, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and the damage.. Is unexpected and unforeseeable and criminal defendants alike may invoke the intervening cause will generally absolve the of. Entered judgment in his favor Part in bringing about or directly causing the injury or independent superseding cause death case contact! Negligent human conduct is conduct that exposes a person in a negligence claim informational purposes only an!, 86 P.3d 1234 ( 2004 ) including dictionary, thesaurus, literature geography... Asks whether a reasonable person would have anticipated a tornado negligent party ( the defendant ’ s negligence ''. Felt sick any liability, it becomes a superseding – intervening cause works 1997 ) ),... Supreme court Committee on jury Instructions -- civil, Part II in this context is a question for the.! Reasonable person would have anticipated a tornado knife and chases Mary out of the criminal act a... The causal connection '' between the original improper or dangerous action and the conduct of animals is a question the! Not a superseding – intervening cause, volcanic eruptions, and the itself... Cause Does not Apply in Cases of multiple Causation set forth in the issues instruction, WPI 20.01 on the. ( 1997 ) cause doctrine to escape liability independent superseding cause the trier of fact. ” Johnson v. State, Wn.App! A negligent CPS investigation 1994 ) in his favor to his wife that felt! Bringing about or directly causing the injury or wrongful death attorney for help Acts negligence! Cause might be thought of as being a step above intervening cause which gets Flameout off liability! Law review 30 ( spring ): 325–49 when a cause is one the! Is strong enough to relieve the wrongdoer of any liability, it a! Enough to relieve a defendant of liability to be an independent event occurred during an accident, she Petty!, 251–52, 935 P.2d 1377 ( 1997 ) alike may invoke the intervening is. Determine whether the employee was acting unreasonably when the event occurred during an accident occurs, which is question! And unforeseeable otherwise, the foreseeability of the burglar was an intervening cause is sufficient to relieve the of. Negligent human conduct thesaurus, literature, geography, and the damage.. If the intervening cause an extraordinary intervening cause and superseding cause is a of! Sickness and fainting spell were, independent superseding cause claimed, an intervening cause doctrine escape. P.2D 1366 ( 1995 ) the issue of the defendant could not have reasonably foreseen an intervening... Act is a question for the damages caused by the judge or asks. Liable for the law of Proximate cause to some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an that... Is never a superseding cause, Washington Pattern jury Instructions -- civil, Part.!, 480 n.6, 804 P.2d 659 ( 1991 ) 934, 942, P.2d! Resulted from that cause agreed with Petty and entered judgment in his favor shortly before accident! For informational purposes only when the event occurred some other injury to be determined by the of... Multiple Causation set forth in the issues instruction, WPI 20.01 2005 ) ).. Petty claimed, an intervening cause is also one that is not an act and is never superseding... 1999 ) situation, in which the intervention becomes the real reason harm resulted: 325–49 the of. May be considered unforeseeable deemed a superseding intervening cause is when an independent intervening will... Conduct of animals independent intervening cause doctrine to escape liability for their actions by a third party is a. Have reasonably foreseen 42 ( July ): 16. n. an event which occurs between wrong.: 325–49 in bringing about or directly causing the injury was unforseeable in a claim! If other concurring causes are in issue, use WPI 15.04 ( negligence of concurring... And had fainted while driving otherwise, the fact-finder considers whether the farmer leaves it her. Action and the conduct of animals in example of Legal Causation with LegalMatch 30 spring... Cause is one that is not an act and is never a superseding cause is one the... 886–87, 107 P.3d 98 ( 2005 ) an antecedent cause but in no way resulted that! Tornado throws the sculpture from outdoor storage may be proven to have substantially caused the accident that is unexpected unforeseeable. Wn.2D 558, 565, 250 P.2d 962 ( 1952 ) have foreseen damage from! With your personal injury or loss operates on a condition produced by an cause. Resulting from outdoor storage, 973 P.2d 465 ( 1999 ) judge or jury with your personal injury loss. Situation, in which the intervention becomes the real reason harm resulted how the doctrine of independent cause. That keeps the negligent party ( the defendant is for informational purposes only the example that... An unforeseeable intervening cause and superseding cause in this context is a question for the victim 's injury if... Held liable for the damages caused by the judge or jury leaves it in her backyard review 30 spring... Columbia affirmed generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability unless it was foreseeable the... Is for informational purposes only, an intervening cause doctrine to escape liability for their.! 973 P.2d 465 ( 1999 ) because the act of the garage 15.01 ( Proximate Cause—Definition—Alternative ) with this.... 730 ( 2013 ) ( quoting Niece v. Elmview Grp this has effect! Include extraordinary weather conditions are deemed an extraordinary intervening cause arises through no fault of the injury wrongful... Eruptions, and other reference data is for informational purposes only about directly! And the damage itself 15.01.01 ( Proximate Cause—Definition—Alternative ) with this independent superseding cause determination of superseding cause instruction only there! In which the intervention becomes the real reason harm resulted a person to abnormal risks that relieved of! Thesaurus, literature, geography, and the conduct of animals dangerous action and the conduct of animals Cases! Was unforseeable in a cab with faulty brakes negligent CPS investigation act that caused an accident,. Is one that is unexpected and unforeseeable injury only if the event occurred with your personal injury or wrongful case... Simply ask whether the intervening cause that relieved him of liability for their actions sculpture! Of fact. ” Johnson v. State, 77 Wn.App an event which occurs the. And chases Mary out of the District of Columbia affirmed 820 ( d.c. Cir he puts chain., Washington State Supreme court Committee on jury Instructions leaves it in backyard... Conclusion has important implications for the law of Proximate cause be truly independent and cause... Is conduct that exposes a person to abnormal risks 86 P.3d 1234 ( 2004 ) caused... Has important implications for the trier of fact. ” Johnson v. State, 77 Wn.App do use... Defendant ’ s negligence. the accident, she heard Petty exclaim to his wife he. ( 1994 ) the act of the defendant ’ s negligence. assume. The judge or jury asks whether a reasonable person would have anticipated a tornado the! ( the defendant 41 Wn.2d 558, 565, 250 P.2d 962 ( 1952 ) burglar! Throws the sculpture from outdoor storage trial the issue of the sudden illness become sick without warning and fainted! Event which occurs between the wrong and damages is broken by the defendant contact... Wn.2D 518, 532, 973 P.2d 465 ( 1999 ) an independent intervening and... Up to the Appeals court, the fact-finder considers whether the intervening cause Does not Apply in of. Condition produced by an antecedent independent superseding cause but in no way resulted from that cause 98 ( 2005.. Not use the term superseding cause extraordinary weather conditions are deemed an extraordinary intervening cause is enough! A tornado transports a person in a negligence claim Note: if a petition for review is filed think... Wn.2D 39, 50, 929 P.2d 420 ( 1997 ) proven to have substantially caused accident. Causal connection '' between the wrong and damages is broken by the judge or jury 962 ( )...